Abortion chain arguing at Supreme Court known for dirty equipment, untrained staff
The case Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, being heard by the Supreme Court, will determine whether the clinic regulations signed into effect by Texas Governor Rick Perry will stand or be struck down as unconstitutional. These regulations require abortionists to have admitting privileges and require abortion facilities to meet the same safety standards as other outpatient facilities, such as those that perform eye surgery and colonoscopies.
Texas Alliance for Life reported yesterday that this same abortion chain that is currently fighting before the Supreme Court to strike down a law on abortion safety regulations has a history of failed inspections, dirty equipment, untrained staff and other health violations. (Earlier this month, Live Action News reported on this discovery here and here.) These repeated health violations among the Whole Woman’s Health chain show that there is a pattern of serious mismanagement among these Texas facilities.
Whole Woman’s Health’s CEO claims they have “40 years of safe abortion on record in Texas” and offer “high-quality” care, but reports of serious health violations dating back as far as 2007 have been uncovered.
Texas Alliance for Life shares their findings from as early as 2011…
Some of the equipment listed in the report are “tenaculums” – grasping forceps used to hold the cervix and uterus in place during an abortion. The report indicates that these were not sterilized in the proper position for killing pathogens, which would have put future patients at great risk, and could have led to severe and life threatening infections. Among the expired medications were antibiotics for preventing and fighting infection, such as Gentamicin and Ampicillin. Along with this, it was noted that staff, and even the clinical director, were untrained in providing basic life support to patients. Abortion drugs weren’t just found in unlocked cabinets – they were even found in an unlocked file cabinet with employees unable to explain why they were there. While policies and procedures were documented, they were clearly not being followed at the Fort Worth Whole Woman’s Health facility.
In 2014, another inspection at the same facility again found that surgical instruments were not being properly sterilized or stored.
Beaumont Whole Woman’s Health
Similar problems were found in 2011 at WWH’s Beaumont facility, which is currently closed. According to Texas Alliance for Life:
These deficiencies could have meant death for a woman injured in an abortion.
A 2013 inspection at the Beaumont facility found similar issues:
The suction machine is the mechanism behind the suction aspiration technique, used most commonly in first-trimester abortions. Watch a description of the suction aspiration abortion below:
San Antonio Whole Woman’s Health
An August 29, 2013, an inspection of Whole Woman’s Health in San Antonio showed violations of a similar nature to those found in the other facilities. Inspectors found that surgical instruments were not properly sterilized due to improper use of the autoclave on the premises. Infection control was also poor, with soiled and clean instruments becoming cross-contaminated due to improper procedures. Medications were improperly stored, staff were not properly trained in sterilization techniques, and the facility used ineffective cleaning and sterilizing supplies on surgical instruments.
McAllen Whole Woman’s Health
Again, similar problems were found in another inspection at Whole Woman’s Health’s McAllen facility on September 4 – improperly trained staff and improper infection control procedures.
Combined violations at Whole Woman’s Health
Just last year, in 2015, inspectors found a whopping 43 pages of violations at the Fort Worth, San Antonio, and McAllen Whole Woman’s Health facilities. These included:
As hard as it is to believe, the very same chain of abortion facilities that is currently arguing before the Supreme Court that abortion is safe and no further regulations are needed, has been cited for serious safety violations in no fewer than 10 inspections over the course of four years.
Is this the kind of care women deserve? Or do women deserve better than than Whole Woman’s Health?
Analysis
